--- robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/>
> > i think that it'd be ok to go with a jexl beta > providing that it was a > proper beta release rather than just a SNAPSHOT. It's probably ok, as long as the Java API is stable and the expression syntax is mostly stable. > on the subject of dependencies, i've just finished > beanutils 1.6.1 which > (hopefully) should work ok with jelly and so you > shouldn't need to rely on > a beanutils SNAPSHOT. Shouldn't be a problem. We're already using BeanUtils 1.6 in the Maven build and it works fine. GUMP also seems happy with the HEAD. - Morgan > - robert > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ===== Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
