So is there an alterative proposal floating around out there?
Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving "One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..." > -----Original Message----- > From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 1:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > Subject: Re: [dbutils] propose adding getResultSetMetaData to > DbUtils.ResultSetHandler > > > > I do not likemore than one method in callback interface and > RSMD is invalidated after close (possible it is not true on > some driver implementation). It is usefull to have RSMD after > "handle", but I prefer to find some better solution to retrieve it. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Caswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Juozas Baliuka'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Jakarta > Commons Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 1:51 AM > Subject: RE: [dbutils] propose adding getResultSetMetaData to > DbUtils.ResultSetHandler > > > But that would be up to the class implementing > ResultSetHandler. Having the operation in the interface would > simply allow a caller to get an instance of some > ResultSetMetaData, however the implementing class handler > choses to provide it. In the test I wrote, I had the > implementing class grab the RSMD instance from the RS as the > first thing done in the handle method, and the instance of > RSMD returned by the RS was intact after the RS was closed. > > > Steven Caswell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving > "One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..." > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 5:25 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [dbutils] propose adding getResultSetMetaData to > > DbUtils.ResultSetHandler > > > > > > I am not sure it will work on closed resultsetm, It is better to > > return custom metadata object and value as result from > handler. I have > > changed "handle" signature it will have "params" from prepared > > statement. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Steven Caswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 7:07 PM > > Subject: [dbutils] propose adding getResultSetMetaData to > > DbUtils.ResultSetHandler > > > > > > As the subject says, I'd like to modify DbUtils.ResultSetHandler to > > add a getResultSetMetaData operation. This would provide a > callback to > > allow an application using DbUtils.execute to get the column > > descriptions from the handler. Proposed signature: > > > > public ResultSetMetaData getResultSetMetaData(); > > > > > > Steven Caswell > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "In our own native land, in defense of the freedom that is our > > birthright, and which we ever enjoyed till the late > violation of it -- > > for the protection of our property, acquired solely by the honest > > industry of our fore-fathers and ourselves, against > violence actually > > offered, we have taken up arms. We shall lay them down when > > hostilities shall cease on the part of the aggressors, and > all danger > > of their being renewed shall be removed, and not before." - Thomas > > Jefferson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
