i don't see any reasons why a new CharUtils class could not be created and these methods included in that class. having said that, i think that two methods is below the critical mass required for that class to be successful and this isn't my itch...
- robert
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 06:46 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Personally I'm against them.
If we do this method, why are we not adding a char override for every method that takes a String as an argument in that way? ie) countMatches, chomp/chompLast[after renaming], getNestedString, indexOfAny, leftPad, replace, reverseDelimitedString, strip etc.
Is there any reason why split/join are special?
StringUtils is already huge and adding lots of overrides just seems to make it even larger. Just looking at the javadoc, I have to wonder why we need the Object[] and the Iterator [okay, i'm actually for this one] and why we don't have an Iterator option for concatenate.
Just my -2 new pence :)
Hen
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hi,
what must I do to get this enhancement into commons-lang dev?
Regards Henning
-- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
