> 2. Have/keep the scope listeners and events?
I personally see Scope as a way to keep me from having to keep writing
subclasses of JellyContext when I want the context to be backed by my
own data structure.
Talking with Strachan I think we're pondering
context.setDefaultScope( myScope );
In that vein, making Scope very simple be best for my particular
use-case.
public interface Scope
{
void setVariable(String name, Object value);
Object getVariable(String name);
}
If the JellyContext wants to check for ListenableScope and fire events,
that's cool, but it'd also be overblown for all of my use-cases.
-bob
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
