I hate to propose such a thing, but is there a need for a commons-regex which would perform the same functions as commons-logging? Where we'd have JDK 1.4 Regular Expressions, Jakarta-RegEx and Jakarta-ORO.
-------- Tim O'Brien > -----Original Message----- > From: robert burrell donkin > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [digester] RegexRules > > > after bit of thought about some recent comments from user, > i've committed > some code based around the idea of using regex's in a pattern > matching > Rules implementation. in order to give flexibility, i've made > the actual > regex matching implementation pluggable. > > i was thinking about creating regex matching implementations based on > jakarta-ORO and jakarta-regex but i don't want to make > Digester dependent > on these subprojects. some other places at jakarta use contribs or a > separate releasable jar for these optional classes. anyone have any > preferences - or any better ideas? > > - robert > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
