i usually use "+1 (non-binding)" and i've seen others use this convention on various apache lists. feel free to edit the etiquette wiki page :)

with the large number of commons committers, it can sometimes be difficult to know which developers are committers. what i usually do is to go through and check when i count up the votes before posting a [RESULT]. (i find http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html is useful.)

but for many votes concerning components, it's the names listed in the STATUS file that are binding (rather than everyone) so this makes it easy to work who's votes are binding.

- robert

On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 09:36 PM, Richard Sitze wrote:

Interesting...  If you have commons-committer status, your vote is
binding.  Is there a protocol for someone to declare themselves
non-binding?

*******************************************
Richard A. Sitze
IBM WebSphere WebServices Development



+1 (non-binding)

- robert

On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 05:41 PM, Richard Sitze wrote:

[OK, Let's try the more formal VOTE subject line :-)  Sorry for the
duplicate note.]

commons-discovery has been fairly stable for a while (one recent bug
fix,
and a few in the past), and I'd like to cut a 0.2 release.

Please VOTE for or against.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to