Brent, thanks for the detailed responses, and if it makes you feel any better my handwriting is much, much worse.
I put a question out to people who can make more official statements about licensing, and I want to see if I can get an official opinion about some of these issues before re-adding Gamma.java and referencing NR. Also, I want to make it clear that I don't think anyone has violated copyright, I just want to tread carefully - best to err on the side of caution. Tim On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 13:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > 2) regularizedGammaP is derived using (6.2.1) and (6.2.5) from NR. > > I also > > > have hand-written notes on how I derived the implementation from > > those > > > formulas that I would be happy to provide for your viewing. > > Here are my aforementioned notes: > http://www.brent.worden.org/math/page.1.tif > http://www.brent.worden.org/math/page.2.tif > > And before anyone says a thing, these are not the result of chicken > scratches. Sadly, it is my handwritting. > > Brent Worden > http://www.brent.worden.org/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
