On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:15:34 +0100 (Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [Docs] Component Lists) robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
pool - i'm reluctant to apply this since i'm not a committer for pool. i realize that this is the second time you've submitted this patch (and thanks for your patience) but could you post this patch again prefixed with [pool] so that the component's maintainers have a better chance to spot it.
Okay.
By the way, the subject should be "[pool][patch] .." ? or "[patch][pool] .."? ... Which is better?
i'd personally write [PATCH][pool] but it shouldn't matter. the main thing is that most pool developers will be filtering for those messages containing pool in the subject. anyone else have any opinions?
Also, which is better, "[PATCH][DOCS] .." or "[SITE][PATCH].." for the patches to the jakarta-commons site (non-specific to each subprojects)?
i'm not sure. anyone else have any opinions?
- robert
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
