Re: [math] StatUtilsTest (was: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/statStatUtils.java)

[Mark R. Diggory]

I'm starting to feel replying to commit messages probibly isn't the best 
route to posting on the list. I recommend we not do it or at least 
rewrite the subject headings to include the [math] string.

Back to the subject, Yes, your quite right, I feel there are two avenues 
of testing going on here:

(1) Direct testing: Copy the StoreUnivariateImplTest and rewrite it to 
work with StatUtils as StatUtilsTest..

(2) Indirect testing: All UnivariateTests currently implemented will 
test against the StatUtil once those implementations have been altered 
to delegate to StatUtils where ever possible. This is currently the case 
with UnivariateImplTest which now really testing against StatUtils in 
the windowed case (This is what I've been testing against during the 
intial dev of StatUtils..

I'm for both approaches as the later won't neccessarily be all inclusive 
of StatUtils capabilities.

-Mark

Phil Steitz wrote:

We need to get test cases committed for StatUtils before adding/modififying
anything else.  I am OK with what has been a added; but we need to comply with
our stated guidelines, which require test cases for all committed code. 
StatUtils needs its own test cases. 

 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]