On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Hi all, > > I read a mail a while ago about the release candidate of fileupload that > explain this release break tomcat!? Some changes to FileUpload did break the *nightly* build of Tomcat, but a patch was provided and has been applied, so there is no longer a problem. > > Is it true? > > If yes, which version of tomcat are affected? You'll need to ask the Tomcat team about that, but I believe currently only the nightly builds of Tomcat 4.x and 5.x use the latest FileUpload. > > As Debian maintainer of fileupload, I'd like to know if I have to tell > Debian users if they have to upgrade tomcat (and which version) if they > install Fileupload v1.0. Tomcat bundles its own copy of FileUpload, as do several other projects, so that issues like this do not occur. If someone tried to *replace* the version bundled with an older version of Tomcat with FileUpload 1.0, that would cause a problem for the Tomcat apps that use it. However, using FileUpload 1.0 in your own apps running on top of Tomcat should not be a problem, since you will be the one writing to the FileUpload API. -- Martin Cooper > > Many thanks for your attention, > > Best regard, Arnaud. > > Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Release Candidate 1 of the Commons FileUpload component has proved to > > be stable, with no new showstopper issues reported since that release, > > and only minor documentation updates applied. > > > > Therefore, I propose that the tip of the main trunk in CVS be released > > as FileUpload 1.0 Final. I will act as the Release Manager. > > -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg > Formateur Cellule Programmation. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
