Howdy, I think a slightly more detailed proposal is needed: one that addresses specifically what commons-uri would address that's missing in java.net.URI and related classes.
Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics >-----Original Message----- >From: Sung-Gu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:10 AM >To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Commons HttpClient Project >Subject: [SURVEY] Commons-URI or not? > > >Hi all, > >I suggest that jakarta-commons provides flexible URI issue implementations >as a package. > >Various applications using URI concept comes in the internet world. and >they need common mechanisms and algorithms for URI. > >For example, all internet programs will need fundamental functionalites of >URI like extensible parsing and manipulation container for URL reference, >URN and URC, escape codec mechanism, charset tranformation functionality, >URI transformation from real world identities or URN, or other >transformations related to DNS or telephony... If it would be prepared >commonly in Jakarta, we can save development powers. So I suggest new >commons-uri package. > >FYI, currently the commons-httpclient is using it. > >Any comments? >Or any +1, -1? > >Sung-Gu > >P.S.: If the requirement is very weak, I want to put the new package into >commons-sandbox even for a long while in my opinion... > This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
