On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Arun Thomas wrote:
> > Agreed 100%! Despite what I've said above, it seems clear that, > particularly where there is no clear specification (as seems to be the > case here), BeanUtils would be well served to follow the behaviour of > standard implementations, rather than making up its own rules. More importantly, BeanUtils is NOT in the business of deciding what properties a bean has. That is the business of the JDK's Introspector class, and BeanUtils simply relies on the output. > However, because it's not in the spec (maybe I'm still missing this), DO > all (or at least most) of the JDK's out there besides besides SUN's > actually behave in this manner? We'll see if the unit test I checked in causes anyone any grief. That's one of the reasons I did it, so we'd get early warning of any such problems :-). > > Cheers, > -AMT Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
