What if you could instantiate StringUtils if you did not like the default behavior:
new StringUtils(StringUtils.ALWAYS_TRIM, StringUtils.DISCARD_NULL); ? Just a random thought. Gary -----Original Message----- From: Lavandowska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 07:30 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] Pre 2.0 - StringUtils.isEmpty(), isNotEmpty() and stri ngsa with somespaces I missed this one earlier, so I guess 2.0 would still work for me, though I find isEmptyTrimmedOrNull() extremely cumbersome. I'd likely just move to isEmpty( trim( str ) ) myself, rather than use the added method signatures. Lance --- Todd Jonker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/15/03 8:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Thus I propose: > > isEmpty(), true for "", false for null > > isEmptyOrNull(), true for "" and null > > isEmptyTrimmed(), trim() then true for "", false for null > > isEmptyTrimmedOrNull(), trim() then true for "", true for null __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
