On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Lavandowska wrote:
> I could live with #1, though I'd rather the current contract (the > trim() functionality) didn't change (whine whine whine). isBlank! Just think of the joy you'll have as you switch to it. It's such a sexier name. > Or #2 is fine also, but I'd suggest another name (StringTests connotes > Unit tests to me), maybe StringChecks or CheckString? 2004! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
