If we do a 1.2, the package comment for .base64 notes: "This package will be removed in release 1.2.". Do we really want that? Or should we update this description to 1.3?
Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 20:13 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [codec] To do for 1.1.1 (or how about 1.2?) > > Gary, Bugzilla is a painful way to manage task lists, but I'm giving it > a try. This isn't "command and control" software development so feel > free to reject the assignment of the urldecode and urlencode methods - > I'll happily make that change if you don't have the bandwidth (it is a > small one...). > > Our target date is the week end - Friday. By then we should complete > the items in the list - I'll focus on documentation in the meantime. > Then let's target sometime next week to ask for a release vote pending > tests. So, feature freeze at where we are, and let's call our target > release 1.2. > > I'd call it 1.1.1, but we've added some functionality - calling it 1.1.1 > would be somewhat misleading. I take full responsibility for not > following 1.1 up with a 1.1.1 when I should have. > > Tim > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
