I understand this. But I do feel that the inclusion of a "combination" distribution will create more confusion and conflicts down the road. I agree something needs to be done to make it easier to use a large set of different commons packages but I think that a tool that puts this together based on some known combinations, is a win-win.Nobody is talking about eliminating the individual releases. The question is whether or not we should offer an *additional* combination package of some sort, and what it should contain. One can certainly extend the concept recursively beyond Jakarta Commons, but something like this is going to align on language lines anyway -- and Jakarta Commons is already only about Java based packages.
I'm on both ;-)For those who wonder why such a combination JAR is important, please hang around on the user lists, not just the developer lists :-).
- Mike
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Craig
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
