Okay. I'll build rc2 tonight. [My company monitor the US power grid, so we're a bit busy at the moment. http://www.genscape.com/blackout-replay.swf is pretty cool :) ]
Hen On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > +1 > A comment of a method, and its time to go RC2. > > Stephen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > +1 to yanking the time code to address #22172 > > > > +1 to applying Pete's javadoc patch if we have it in the next day or > > two, but otherwise calling it quits for 2.0. Sure, we could keep > > refining tests and javadoc, but I think that the consensus is that we > > are in pretty good shape for the stuff that is going to be released. I > > at least am happy with all of the stuff that I have reviewed/contributed > > to. The only packages that I have not looked at carefully are builder > > and enum. I notice some test path coverage gaps in exception, but the > > key stuff appears to be well tested and if others have confidence in the > > code, I am +1 for release as is. > > > > Not sure exactly what to do about #22393. I posted a comment pointing > > out that serialization of Nestable is actually tested in > > NestableExceptionTestCase and asking for sample code. > > > > Phil > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
