How about the -target 1.1 flag to the 1.4 compiler? Ant allows us to pass this, and apparantly 1.1 means JDK's 1.1->1.3. So we would javadoc with 1.4 and build with 1.4 for 1.1->1.3.
No idea how much of a guarentee that is. Hen On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Can we guarantee that the 1.4 built version is bytecode compatable with 1.2? > Its not nice whichever way around you do it. > > How about build under 1.4, then use the jar to run the test cases against > under 1.2? > > Stephen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > > > +1 to RC3 > > > > > > BTW, is there a problem with building with 1.2.2 if our javadoc has been > > > optimised for 1.4? The javadoc compiler has changed. Can the docs be > built > > > using 1.4 instead? > > > > Ack. So we want a 1.2 built jar and a 1.4 built javadoc? > > > > Maybe I should just go ahead and use 1.4 to distribute. While I could > > merge a 1.4 and 1.2 set of builds, it wouldn't be something the user > > could repeat with the -src jar. > > > > Hen > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
