Re: [lang] Remove reflect code?

[robert burrell donkin]

hi todd

i agree with stephen. there shouldn't be too much difference between 
rolling your own distribution from CVS whether it's lang or reflect. if 
you do care about reflect then what it needs (before it can be promoted) 
are (IMHO) a lot of well written unit tests. if you have some time and 
would like to see reflect pushed on, maybe you'd like to contribute at 
least a few.

BTW i'm +1 about removing reflect from lang but could we tag before it's 
removed so that people can build the lang reflect stuff from the tag if 
they wish.

- robert

On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 11:22 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:

I should clarify, the reflection code in [lang] wasn't released in the
recent 2.0 release, and is in effect sandbox code in the wrong place.
Stephen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Todd Jonker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This doesn't seem appropriate until [reflect] moves out of the sandbox 
and
has a 1.0 release.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 09:18 PM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: [lang] Remove reflect code?
Are we OK with removing the reflect code from [lang] now?
[reflect] in the sandbox contains the code now so having it in [lang]
still
is just confusing...

I will remove it soon, unless someone objects.

Stephen




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]