So, you mean something like public static Registry constructDefaultRegistry();
on class HiveMind? That's not a bad idea at all. -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/ http://javatapestry.blogspot.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Essl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:36 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [HiveMind] I don like HiveMind.getDefault and > setDefault(Registry) > > > I was now thinking about why I did not like getDefault(). I > think the real (Freud'schen) reason was that the first time I > saw it I expected it to be something I could get a default > registry from. (You know I was eagar to try it out, had my > head full with the new stuff and didn't want to go through > the setup things). > > Of course bootstraping is well documented now and it is easy. > But I think the same still applies to new users and the most > prominent class is now a bit naked. > > So I'd like to propose a static factory method which just > builds up a default new Registry (read all modules from the > Context ClassLoader). I think this would also save cut/paste > for many uses. > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Gesendet von http://mail.yahoo.de > Schneller als Mail - der neue Yahoo! Messenger. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
