Oh yes, of course, clearly the power of schemas hasn't completely sunk in yet. May be we have to add a little more documentation to the interceptors to make this apparent? This is fabulous!

-Harish


Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:


Actually, that's why we allow parameters to an interceptor. I can envision something like:

<service-point ...
 <interceptor service-id="foo.security">
   <method name="read" role="system"/>
   <method name="update" role="admin"/>
   <method name="*" role="user"/>
 </interceptor>

--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
http://javatapestry.blogspot.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Harish Krishnaswamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:56 PM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: [HiveMind] Selective intercepting



Interceptors, as I know of them in HiveMind right now, can only be applied across the board to all methods in the service; there is no selectivity. But, I think, selective intercepting will be a requirement for other kinds of interceptors (like a security interceptor or a transactional interceptor, for example). What do you think? I realize this would be treading along the AOP territory; may be this could extend into an ultra light aspect framework too! One for all!


-Harish


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Reply via email to