--- Dirk Verbeeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Same response, I don't really have a strong feeling about it, just > wanted to keep in sync with DBCP (at least the mayor version).
Pool is independent from DBCP and doesn't need to depend on DBCP's version numbers. Backwards incompatible changes trigger a major version change, not necessarily changes in other projects. David > > OK, no incompatible changes => keep major number. > > New proposal: > Release both DBCP & pool as 1.1 > > Dirk > > David Graham wrote: > > >I have the same question here as I did for DBCP: are there any > backwards > >incompatible changes that require a major release number change? I'd > >prefer to keep the major number the same if possible. > > > >FWIW, I haven't seen any incompatible changes in the DBCP or Pool > commits > >that I've reviewed. > > > >David > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
