Sure if the static field changes this ensures consistency, but on the other hand it would be also very convient to change all services referenced but just changing the static field without the need to go into the module.
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 12:40:12 +0200, Knut Wannheden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have created a copy of the hivemind.BuilderFactory service which allows me
to write:
<invoke-factory service-id="my.BuilderFactory"> <construct class="foo.Bar" static-field="foo.Bar.INSTANCE"/> </invoke-factory>
given that I have something like:
package foo; public interface Bar { static final INSTANCE = new BarImpl(); }
The class attribute is used to check that the object specified by the static-field is of a given type, which is an interface in this example.
--knut
That's certainly a good idea.objects
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:50:42 +0200, Knut Wannheden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I was wondering whether it would make sense to extend the BuildFactory > service (or maybe add a new wervice) to also be able to construct> by > returning the value of a classes static field or by calling a static > method > on a class. The former would obviously be simpler. E.g. (as a new > service): > > <invoke-factory service-id="hivemind.StaticBuilderFactory"> > <construct class="foo.Bar" static-field="BAZ"> > <set.../> > </construct> > </invoke-factory> > > --knut > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
