OrderedSet.defaultInstance()
or
OrderedSet.newInstance()
It seems more standard... what do you think?
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
This sounds OK, but what would the method be called?
OrderedSet.decorate() OrderedSet.decorateHashSet()
? Stephen
----- Original Message ----- From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Basically, the lack of empty constructors with default decoration decisions. Example I'm looking at:
I want an OrderedSet. The only way to get this is:
OrderedSet.decorate( new HashSet() )
[okay, could do TreeSet etc, also could use MapUtils].
I don't know about you, but this feels odd. :) Especially as the user knows that HashSet is unordered, so why provide it.
This may be a unique example, but it seems that we could choose a default empty map for each one.
Just a view..
Hen
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
