While I'm at giving my thoughts on names for things, I would also like to see the package o.a.c.collections.observed change to observable to match the class names. I can submit a patch if desired, but most of the change is in cvs, not in the source code.
michael On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Heuer wrote: > > For what it's worth, I much prefer using the name [primitives] to > [pcollections]. > > (non-binding) +1 > > michael > > > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > Should we name it [pcollections]? Or is [primitives] better? (The sandbox > > primitives is then a sandbox for the proper component for experimentation). > > > > I had forgotten about the special io input stream stuff, which might lead to > > the name [primitives]. I don't think that this affects the vote, but it does > > affect the CVS creation! > > > > Stephen > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
