Concerning configuration: I think there should be a standard schema (my be RelaxedNG). But - while keeping the build in processing - there should be a possibility to leave the processing definition to the definer using special services. As I see (yet another suggestion) this could be easily acomplished if it was possible to get the (unparsed) Elements from the ConfigurationPoint.
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:35:47 -0400, Howard M. Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been touching up the framework and docs and I really think HiveMind is ready to go into beta.
My definition of beta is "code complete, no changes outside of focused bug fixes". In other words,
by going to beta, we're saying that HiveMind is feature complete for a 1.0 release.
We have lots of cool ideas for a 1.1 release ... but despite the surprising amount of interest in
HiveMind, my preference is to keep it as small and focused as possible, without omitting any
features that will be generally useful.
I've lost track of all the cool ideas that have popped up. We need a HiveMind wiki somewhere.
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/ http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- -- Christian Essl http://jucas.sourceforge.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
