On Tuesday, November 4, 2003, at 04:00 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
The main aim of the Mutator change was to make the implementation obvious
and typesafe. IMO it does fit better with the collections API.

Okay, I don't feel strongly about it, and if it stays as an inner class it will work fine. I will propose changing the name to CollectionMutator though in order to allow ListMutator and SetMutator in the subclasses.

-Brian

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to