Al Chou wrote:
--- "Mark R. Diggory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have several modifications I'm planning to make, but in the spirit of consensus I want to propose them and attempt to get some agreement. So math developer opinions on the subject would be good.
1.) o.a.c.math.stat.distributions --> o.a.c.math.distributions
Gives this package a more "generic" position to hold more than just "stat" distributions.
What other kinds of distributions did you have in mind? I'm asking out of complete ignorance.
Probability Distributions (Gamma, Beta, Poisson, Exponential, Logarithmic, Hyperbolic ...) great examples of these are in Colt's
cern.jet.stat and cern.jet.random packages.
... but are bound up as implementations of RandomNumberGeneration classes...not that that a bad thing.
Eventually ours could be used in random number generation, I think they should be a more dominant package.
-Mark
-- Mark Diggory Software Developer Harvard MIT Data Center http://osprey.hmdc.harvard.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
