On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 9 Nov 2003, at 22:07, Mark R. Diggory wrote: > > > 1.) Plausible, I understand though that Apache Commons is under > > subversion, will this be a challenge to migrate to? > > subversion is (by all accounts) very, very cool. everyone here at > apache will be using it sooner or later. those nice people over at > apache commons will allow commons-maths to use cvs initially (if that's > what's needed) but it'd probably be worthing thinking about making the > jump straight away. You'll also have active support from those in favour of Subversion [coders of which are at Apache] so I'd expect this to move smoothly. > > 2.) How will we relate to Jakarta Commons? certainly we may have > > dependencies on parts of the commons, but doesn't this leave little > > room for jakarta commons components to utilize math as a dependency as > > they are generally expected to be dependent on only other jakarta > > commons projects. > > commons-maths will still be part of jakarta-commons :) > > it'll only be managed by the apache-commons pmc. I'm with Rod here. It won't be a part of jakarta-commons, though it should still be some kind of link on the Jakarta site. Jakarta Commons ought to have a vote to add dependency on Apache Commons Java projects as an acceptable concpet. This does raise a question in the PMC-setup for the ASF. If a project is meant to be a part of Jakarta and another project, ie) Commons, must there be a 1 to 1 mapping on the PMCs. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
