From: "Michael Heuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Observable does seem to have the potential to be popular. (I've received
> > various communications about it.) One possibility might be to create a
> > new jakarta-commons project for it like primitives. Although that does
> > seem a little extreme, it might allow it to grow and include other JDK
> > integration classes for example.
> >
> > Stephen
>
> I think I would support a move of the Observable classes to a separate
> project, but I feel that moves the release that much further away.
>
> In addition to the existing implementations, I would also like to see
> Observable maps, primitive collections, and Colt 2D and 3D matrices.  The
> latter I was planning to implement in a separate repository after the
> observable classes in commons were released.
I won't move Observable at the moment (ie. I'll leave it in its current
package), but I may see about moving it to a separate project sometime soon.
Its like primitives in that it has potential to grow.

Stephen


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to