Just to confirm, you want map.firstKey() to return the next key to be removed from the map? Stephen
> from: __matthewHawthorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I think eldest first makes more sense, based on the nature of the class. > > > > > Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > The old LRUMap ordered the elements eldest to newest in the iterator. The > > new LRUMap does the opposite. Should we be sticking to the eldest first > > ordering? Or is newest first a better more sensible ordering? > > > > Stephen > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
