+1 to JUnit 3.8.1

Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 13:55
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] JUnit version, broken tests
> 
> +1, enough time has now passed for JUnit3.8 to be OK
> 
> Stephen
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:45 PM
> Subject: [lang] JUnit version, broken tests
> 
> 
> > Some tests (/builder/ShortPrefixToStringStyleTest, ArrayUtils.Test) have
> > been been added/modified to require Junit 3.8.  I have no problem with
> > this; but we need to modify the dependency in project.xml for the maven
> > build to work in this case.  Any objections to this change?
> >
> > I am seeing the following failure in the builder tests:
> >
> > Testcase: testNestedBroken took 0.006 sec
> > FAILED
> > expected:<0> but was:<3>
> > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<0> but was:<3>
> > at
> org.apache.commons.lang.enum.EnumTest.testNestedBroken(EnumTest.java:432)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at
> >
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:
> 39
> )
> > at
> >
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorIm
> pl
> .java:25)
> >
> > I am using Sun Linux JDK 1.4.2
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to