Sounds good. Why not just grab dbcp's and see what we (our code) disagree with? :)
Hen On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Phil Steitz wrote: > Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Since we now have checkstyle.xml, can we remove checkstyle.properties? > > > > Gary > > +1 > > We should also think about updating this. When I created checkstyle.xml, > I just translated from the existing checkstyle.properties. There is not > much in there. That's OK with me personally, but if we want to consider a > more aggressive set of checks, we might want to do some "comparative > shopping" among the other commons components. One that has a pretty > comprehensive set of checks is [dbcp]. > > Phil > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
