On Wednesday 07 January 2004 11:14 am, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, steve cohen writes: > >I keep coming back to the ant use case and how we'd handle it there. I > >suppose we could add yet another parameter to the ant <ftp> task to handle > >this odd case, but I'd rather not. I'm still not happy with this but I > > don't have a better suggestion yet. > > Okay, so am I correct that in ant you can explictly define the parser key? > If that's the case then one can implement a factory that recognizes a > special parser key (or add it to the default factory), like VMSV that > will create a VMS entry parser which handles versioning. That is, assuming > the ant task calls listFiles(String, String), which is what I understood > to be the reason you gave to keep the method public when Jeffrey suggested > it not be public. > > daniel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exactly so. This will work. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
