On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > I don't have a direct need for a MIME type component myself, but this > certainly sounds widely popular and useful. > > I would however suggest starting in the sandbox with a dependency on > [codec]. That way you'll have more freedom of design to start with, and not > block releases of [codec]. You may find that once complete you merge the > mime code into codec, or you may find not. But leave that decision until > later.
+1. I was thinking along the same lines myself. Perhaps we start out in the sandbox as [mime], and then when we have our act together, we can have a discussion about merging with [codec] or not. (I have a feeling that a full MIME library would rather swamp the rest of Codec, at least as it is today, but we can talk about that later, when we actually have code. ;) -- Martin Cooper > > Stephen > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
