> > I prefer to leave these maven sections in. Simply for maven consistency > > across all maven websites. > > OK, but can we limit reports on the public site to JavaDocs, Unit Tests, > Sourc XRef, Test XRef and License? These are more or less stable. > > Notice that I left out checkstyle ;) We should probably add a > checkstyle.xml reflecting current practices and put some effort into > cleaning up the stuff that we actually care about. Either that or we > should just eliminate this report entirely. I will volunteer to help with > the cleanup if we decide to do this prior to release; but I would also be > OK moving forward with the code as is. The vast majority of problems > being reported by the current (maven plugin default?) checks are just > formatting.
I must admit to not having read the checkstyle report. I'd rather get the release out, than fix anything though. I guess I'm neutral on whether to keep the report in. Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
