David,

thanks for your response. Well, what I intend to do is to use DbUtils for resource management, I only need a hook for creating a specialized statement. (The prepareStatment() method you mentioned does not seem to work for this purpose because of its limited arguments.)

It's a bit tricky: DbUtils does everything I need, including management of the connection and processing of the PreparedStatement object. If I only had a chance to feed in my own statement.

Oli

David Graham schrieb:

QueryRunner has a protected prepareStatement method that can be overridden
with custom handling:

http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbutils/xref/org/apache/commons/dbutils/QueryRunner.html#140

DbUtils isn't about modeling various SQL components as objects.  IMO, the
real benefit of using DbUtils is the automatic resource cleanup.  Since
you are handling Connection and Statement objects outside of DbUtils, the
library can't clean them up for you.  You could handle the resource
cleanup yourself (not use QueryRunner) and still use BasicRowProcessor to
process ResultSets into objects.

David

--- Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello,

I am working on a kind of SQL SELECT generator library. The basic idea is that you have an object representing the query to be performed. You add objects for the fields to be retrieved and feed it with condition objects. Finally it returns a fully initialized PreparedStatement
object.


I would now like to use [dbutils] to execute the queries, but I have the

problem that none of the query() methods of QueryRunner really fits my needs because I have already a PreparedStatement. To solve this, would it be possible to introduce a Query interface in [dbutils], which could look as follows:

public interface Query {
   PreparedStatement getStatement(Connection conn) throws SQLException;
}

Then there could be an additional query() method in QueryRunner that expects such a Query object as argument. It would fetch the statement from this object and execute it.

I know that you try to keep [dbutils] small. This interface would not really add new functionality to this component, but may extent its usage. What do you think?

If there is interest, I can try to provide a patch.

Regards
Oli


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to