Quoting Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > On 4 Feb 2004, at 19:52, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > IIRC i think licensing is closed. i think license is open. (hopefully > > someone will correct me if i'm wrong) >
It's the other way around. The "license" list was for discussion of the 2.0 license during its development (over almost two years). The "licensing" list is for general questions about licensing and ASF. > Sounds good. I couldn't find anything on the website about it [the legal > page should specify it I would have thought]. I didn't check the mail2 > page though. > I can save you some time though, in answer to the original question on this thread. The relicensing is occuring on the copy of the code that has already been contributed to the ASF (and carries an ASF copyright). Anything an original contributor wants to do on their own (with their own rights to the original code) is independent of, and irrelevant to, this relicensing. No retroactive request for relicensing permission is needed -- it was granted in the first place when the contributor allowed the code to be copyrighted by ASF. > Hen Craig McClanahan (Jakarta PMC Member) (ASF Member) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
