site's cool. What about the projects not on maven yet. Do they need the build.xml, build.properties.sample system still?
Also, the old xdocs->docs build system. Are we ready to replace that with a maven multiproject? Hen On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Mark R. Diggory wrote: > "site" is fine too. If anyone is opposed to "site" speakup know, I'm not > really interested in seeing this "lag" on-and-on over the name of the > directory. ;-) > > -Mark > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > >>/jakarta-commons/commons-site/ > > > > > > Any reason for the seemingly redundant "commons", as opposed to: > > > > /jakarta-commons/site/ > > > > ? Not a sticking point. Just a question. > > > > --- Noel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > Mark Diggory > Software Developer > Harvard MIT Data Center > http://www.hmdc.harvard.edu > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
