Stephen, most of the maven site already have stylesheets to address your concern.
Tim On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Once again, this misses the point for me. The newer maven style is much > worse not better. We need a L+F that is controlled by commons, not by > whatever maven decides to do today. I'll try and play tonight. > > Stephen > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > And the 'new look and feel' can be done by using RC1 and the included > > xdocs/project.css (from memory). > > -- > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > > > > > > > > "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 16/02/2004 03:17:00 PM: > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 7:57 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: [all] maven sites > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, someone is publishing Commons Maven sites with an unreleased > > > > version of Maven. Probably either from Maven's CVS HEAD, or a > > > > beta version. > > > > > > > > BeanUtils, Betwixt, and Digester all have the newish Maven L+F. A > > > > decision was reached a while back to standardize on the released > > version > > > > of Maven. > > > > > > > > Could whoever did that please get the released version of Maven and > > > > republish those sites? > > > > > > There is no released version of Maven yet, according to the Maven web > > site. > > > There's just RC1. > > > > > > -- > > > Martin Cooper > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- ---------------------- Tim O'Brien Evanston, IL (847) 863-7045 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
