It doesn't matter to Gump which you chose, the main thing is that if the Gump descriptor for a project references a license filename, and that filename is missing, it'll complain.
That has caught us on few LICENSE <-> LICENSE.txt changes recently. regards Adam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [all] LICENSE vs LICENSE.txt (was: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-jjar failed) > > My fault, I thought it was the other way around for Commons. > > Hen > > On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Michael Davey wrote: > > > Gump 'bot (pretending to be Ted Husted) wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > >Project commons-jjar has an issue affecting it's community integration. The current state is 'Failed', for reason 'Build Failed' > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > >BUILD FAILED > > >/data3/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/jjar/build.xml:173: Warning: Could not find file /data3/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/jjar/LICENSE to copy. > > > > > > > > I thought that the idea was that the prefered name is without an extension: > > > > <quote href="http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html";> > > > > *Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt?* > > > > This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called > > LICENSE and NOTICE. > > > > </quote> > > > > -- > > Michael > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
