> I would attribute the "cryptographic quality" reference in section 4 as > just referring to randomization. Making the PRNG pluggable might > be a good > compromise solution. > > Phil
I think that sounds good, for the version 4 (random bytes) uuid (I think that's what you meant? - version 1 uses MD5 of system info or the MAC address.) The other calls to SecureRandom should be changed now that I understand more about Random randomness. I can send patches if or unless anyone wants to beat me to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
