Re: [HiveMind] Re: Alternative module descriptors

[Harish Krishnaswamy]

Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:

The advantage of XML in HiveMind is that it can be used to directly generate HiveDoc.  
 

Yes, I suppose generating hivedoc from the script will be more work.

I also think that HiveMind's use of XML (both to define services, and to contribute configurationd
data) is very concise and readable.
 

Its concise in XML unit-of-measurement which in itself is an order of 
magnitude more verbose than scripting!

--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components 
http://howardlewisship.com

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Harish Krishnaswamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 9:17 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [HiveMind] Re: Alternative module descriptors



Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:

   

Hi,

What does everyone think about an alternative way of defining the 
modules (XML less! I have had an itch for this for sometime now). I 
was looking at Dynaop yesterday and I really like their way of 
configuring using Beanshell. Its very concise and seems like an apt 
tool for the purpose.

-Harish



     

---------------------------------------------------------------------
   

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
     

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]