Hi, >However, this approach would introduce some dependencies on non-Lang >components (IO, Collections, etc) into Lang (the Functor dependency is >quite trivial and easily removed, but the others are used heavily). I >don't know if this is an issue or not.
It's definitely an issue: AFAIK we don't want lang to depend on those. What's in IO/Collections that you can't do without for Jestr? >Also, there is the dependency on the properties file for configuration, >which is an unfortunate hack that I hope to replace with Commons >Configuration. Thus there would be a dependency from Lang to >Configuration. Again, I don't know if that's an issue or not. Is there >any precedent for a Configuration dependency of this sort? There's no precedence for a Configuration dependency of any sort since there's never been a Configuration release. And if we keep adding features prior to the 1.0 RC, there won't be a Configuration release for a while probably ;) (I'm not saying that as a bad thing, just a matter of fact). Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
