Emmanuel Bourg wrote on Friday, April 02, 2004 11:23 AM:
> Eric Pugh wrote:
>
>> Actually, on second look, I think there is something else wrong with
>> ConfigurationFactory, not the System stuff..
>>
>> ERic
>
> I just checked with the latest version, TestConfigurationFactory is
> fine. There are 2 exceptions displayed on the standard output
> but it's expected.
Since such "expected" stack traces created sometimes also irritations on my side, I do
usually now following in such tests:
-----%<-----
/**
* @see junit.framework.TestCase#setUp()
*/
protected void setUp() throws Exception {
super.setUp();
m_logName = System.getProperty(Log.class.getName(), "");
System.setProperty(Log.class.getName(), NoOpLog.class.getName());
LogFactory.releaseAll();
}
/**
* @see junit.framework.TestCase#tearDown()
*/
protected void tearDown() throws Exception {
System.setProperty(Log.class.getName(), m_logName);
LogFactory.releaseAll();
super.tearDown();
}
-----%<-----
Regards,
J�rg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
