Jakarta-Commons is probably the best place for it but lets see if there is a community for it, getting the geronumo guys on board would be a plus.

-- Dirk

hammett wrote:
Hey Dirk

I read some non-good comments about DBCP in some posts on TheServerSide.
These really bothered me, and I'm reconsidering the usage.  Also I spent
some hours digging into JBoss and Geronimo source tree, and find out that
the best way to handle Connections/Pool/Transaction is to use JCA and JTA. A
simple JTA spec implementation is trivial, but a JCA is not. I'm working on
that right this moment. Not sure if we can join efforts with Geronimo guys
cause the JMX mess all around.

About your question, the container intercepts look ups for connections
(through JNDI) and associates the connection with a component activity
context - or other strategy. If a Transaction is already in place, or beguns
after that, the container asks for a XAResource and enlists it to get it
working with two phase commit protocol. A smart container implementation
will use the same enlisted connection throught the transaction lifecycle -
although it should not share it. The container can also register a
Syncronization within the transaction to release the resources as soon as
the transactions end (successful or not).

Right now I'm working just in the interfaces definitions. Then I'll work on
test cases and finally the implementation. Let me know if you'd like to give
me a hand on this, or if ASF-Commons would like such implementation.

Cheers,
hammett



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to