I think that implementing combinatorial algorithms to meet needs like Paul's and 
Herve's below would make a good addition to [math].  Starting with clean room 
implementations of algorithms to meet specific practical needs would be a better way 
to go than translating or porting existing libraries, IMHO.  
 
Can you guys provide a little more detail on what your application needs are?
 
Phil

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Allen Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Mon 4/19/2004 1:14 PM 
        To: Jakarta Commons Developers List 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: [math] Graph theory
        
        

        I've always thought something similar to the boost graph library
        (http://www.boost.org/libs/graph/doc/index.html) would be useful.  Now that
        Java has generics as well it might be an easier first-cut translation...
        
        On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:50:11PM +0200, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
        > How do you compare your package to jGraph (which does not only drawing)
        > and othr packages that do visual drawing at the same time as other
        > functionalities.
        >
        > Maybe the name "graph-theory" is a bit vague... for exampe, I know I've
        > been looking very long for a package that could allow me to build
        > combinatorial graphs and would then allow me to compute the distance
        > between subsets... I've never found that.
        >
        > paul
        >
        >
        > On 19-Apr-04, at 21:07 Uhr, Herve Quiroz wrote:
        >
        > >Hi,
        > >
        > >
        > >Is there something planned regarding graph theory within the [math]
        > >project?
        > >
        > >I'm asking because I'm coding a network simulator and I have been
        > >looking for such a package for a while. Now I've implemented my own
        > >(quite limited and specific) package. Still, if someone already planned
        > >something similar in the [math] package, I may contribute instead of
        > >re-inventing the wheel (once again)...
        > >
        > >Herve
         
        
        

Reply via email to