On Apr 22, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:
Perhaps some of the classes in [collections] could be presented as a JSR for inclusion in the JDK at some later date. That might cut the size of the jar some. :)
All kidding aside, I like this idea. How about starting by splitting collections into, really common collections, and the rarely used collections.
A neat ideal, but perceptions of "really common" versus "rarely used" seem to be awfully personal. Kinda reminds me of earlier commons-dev discussions trying to create a "commons core" JAR that included all of the "really common" commons JARs, and none of the others. Needless to say, there was no consensus on what the contents should be :-).
-dain
Craig McClanahan
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
