On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 09:09, robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 24 Apr 2004, at 04:19, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > <snip> > > > From what I can see on TOMCAT-DEV, the Tomcat developers think that > > there are backwards incompatibilities for Tomcat users (beyond any > > issues that might affect Tomcat itself). Based on that, I've > > certainly been one of those casting aspersions. If we're all full of > > it, a [collections] statement on the nature and scope of backwards > > compatibility, pointing out the error of our (Tomcat developers and > > my) ways, would go a long ways towards addressing this concern. > > > > Struts is shortly going to be in the same boat ... the dependency of > > Struts itself on collections is only that inherited from > > Digester/BeanUtils; but the Struts developers will want to ensure that > > an upgrade to Collections 3.0 won't cause undue problems for users of > > Struts, before we switch. > > i've been wondering if a possible solution might be to include > org.apache.commons.collections.ArrayStack and > org.apache.commons.collections.Buffer in with a new beanutils release. > these are very stable classes and only the javadocs have changed since > the 2.1 collections release.
+1 from me. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
