1.2.1 looks likely.

BTW, you should always compile the release jar on JDK1.3, as a 1.4 built one
often doesn't run on JDK 1.2/1.3.

Stephen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think a fix release is needed for this.
> Guys, what should the name of such a version be?
> Are there any guidelines about releasing a fix version for such a small
but
> vital thing?
>
> On Tuesday 04 May 2004 4:17 pm, Steve Cohen wrote:
> > Ouch!  That's a bug.  Please enter it into bugzilla.  I guess we'll have
to
> > get a fix release for that.  It certainly was not the intent to release
the
> > product for jdk 1.4+ and it's egg on my face.
> >
> > On Tuesday 04 May 2004 1:06 pm, Edelson, Justin wrote:
> > > Does the net 1.2 require JDK 1.4 to compile? The only documentation
that
> > > mentions it (that I've found) is the Release Notes for 1.1.1, which
> > > claim that future versions (>1.2) will require JDK 1.2. It's unclear
> > > whether this is for compilation or at runtime.
> > >
> > > However, net 1.2 won't compile against anything prior to 1.4 (I'm
> > > working with 1.3.1) because
> > > org.apache.commons.net.ftp.parser.NTFTPEntryParser tries to call
> > > Calendar.getTimeInMillis() on line 132, which prior to 1.4 was a
> > > protected method.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to